I believe it's time we reconsider
the role billionaires play in our economy and our society.
In fact, I say it's time we outlaw
billionaires by placing a 100% tax on any wealth over $999,999,999.
Trust me, we'll all be much better off
in a nation free of billionaires.
Look around, the whole planet is in
crisis. Europe is on the brink of collapse, the United States economy is
sputtering out, freak climate-change induced weather is becoming more and more
common, our streets are becoming the breeding grounds for social instability,
and all the while there is a small cadre of very, very wealthy individuals --
billionaires -- who are sucking up more and more of the wealth that used to
belong to working people.
Just consider these numbers: Post
World War II, all income levels in America grew together, and the lowest income
level -- the 20% poorest Americans -- actually grew at a faster rate that the
top 20% wealthiest Americans.
During this time, billionaires were
few and far between in America as wealth was more evenly distributed.
But since Reagan , and since a new
mentality was instilled in our culture that greed is good, and that the
super-rich shouldn't be questioned or asked to sacrifice anymore for their
nation, then income for the top has increased rapidly -- while actually falling
for the bottom.
Since 1980, the top 1% has sucked up
80% of all the new wealth created. And, in 2010, the richest one percent of
Americans received 93% of all of the new income earned that year.
And now there are over 400
billionaires in America.
In fact, today, the richest 400
Americans -- all of whom are billionaires -- own more wealth than the bottom
150 million Americans COMBINED. The richest six members of the Sam Walton
family -- heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune and, again, all billionaires -- own
more wealth than the bottom 30 percent of Americans COMBINED.
According to a recent study from the
Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly
40 percent from 2007-2010.
That's the equivalent of wiping out
18 years of savings for the average middle class family.
And that money went to the richest
400 Americans -- all billionaires -- who collectively own $1.3 trillion worth
of wealth.
The issue is not punishing the
wealthy. The issue is acknowledging that billionaires have sucked up so much
wealth out of our economy that the rest of us are drowning.
What's worse is the rest of us are
working harder than ever. Productivity has steadily increased post-World War 2,
and it used to be that income gains increased right alongside it.
But around the time of Reagan, productivity
and wages began to diverge.
While productivity increased, wages
stagnated. That's because all the extra profits made by increased productivity
weren't given back to the workers, but instead pocketed by CEOs and executives.
In other words, we're all working
harder, but unfortunately by no will of our own have been forced to give up
these fruits of our labor to the elites -- to the billionaires whose wealth has
exploded and continues to increase year after year.
And what have we working people been
given out of this deal with the billionaires?
We've been given political
corruption as billionaires like Sheldon Adelson and the Koch Brothers can now
buy politicians and legislation to benefit their own selfish interests like tax
cuts for wealthy people, deregulation for polluting oil corporations, and free
trade for job outsourcers.
We've been given gigantic
transnational corporations -- steered by billionaires -- that can crush the
competition of small business and kill the American entrepreneurial spirit.
According to a newly released study
by the New American Foundation, the number of entrepreneurs per capita in
America has dropped by 53% since 1977.
And since 1991, the number of
Americans who are self-employed has dropped by more than 20%.
Americans who use to be able to
start their own businesses are increasingly being forced to join the ranks of
the working poor -- crowded out of the market by the billionaires' corporate
domination.
We've been given financial
instability as billionaires, having more money than they can spend in a dozen
lifetimes, go to Wall Street to gamble.
As author Larry Beinhardt has
discovered, whenever tax rates drop below 50% -- and the super-rich have a lot
of hot money to play with -- there are always subsequent economic crashes: It
happened in the 1920s, it happened in the 1980s with the Savings and Loan
crisis, and it happened just a few years ago with the housing bubble bursting.
Not only that, the billionaires have
even denied us -- and themselves -- happiness.
As a 2010 study by the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences found: "Emotional well-being rises with
income, but there is no further progress beyond an annual income of $75,000.
Low income exacerbates the emotional pain associated with
such misfortunes as divorce, ill health, and being alone.
We conclude that high income buys life satisfaction but not
happiness."
In other words, once your basic
essentials are met, which can be achieved with a $75,000 a year income; any
extra money doesn't make you any happier.
But above all else, our subservience
to the billionaires has given us a perverse form of capitalism -- corporate
capitalism -- which subjugates all the needs of our society like clean air,
food and water, security, healthcare, education, retirement, and energy to the
demands of quarterly profits.
To the demands of billionaires who
sit in corporate boardrooms and figure out what extra bit of profit they can
squeeze out of their workers, out of the fracking wells, out of the Gulf of
Mexico, out of bombs dropping on Afghanistan, out of healthcare premiums, and
out of pensions and retirements.
As Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist
Chris Hedges has routinely pointed out, corporate capitalism, if left
unchecked, will kill us.
And the way to put a check on it
today is to cut off the spigot funneling what was once middle class wealth to
the billionaires.
We can't say we weren't warned of
the dangers that might come with the rise of the billionaires.
Our most influential Founding
Father, Thomas Jefferson, wrote exhaustively about the dangers of an
aristocracy -- or what the billionaires would have been called back in his day.
As he wrote to George Washington in
1786, "Tho' the day may be at some distance, beyond the reach of our
lives perhaps, yet it will certainly come, when, a single fiber left of this
institution, will produce an hereditary aristocracy which will change the form
of government from the best to the worst in the world ... I shall think little
also [of our government's] longevity unless this germ of destruction be taken
out."
And as he wrote to John Adams in
1813 -- re-hashing a debate the two had over the Senate, which at the time was
hand-picked by wealthy state legislators:
"The
artificial aristocracy is a mischievous ingredient in government, and provision
should be made to prevent its ascendancy ... I think that to give them power in
order to prevent them from doing mischief, is arming them for it, and
increasing instead of remedying the evil."
We were warned by President Grover
Cleveland -- the only Democrat elected during the Robber Baron -- who, in his
1888 State of the Union address, said:
"As
we view the achievements of aggregated capital, we discover the existence of
trusts, combinations, and monopolies, while the citizen is struggling far in
the rear or is trampled to death beneath an iron heel.
Corporations, which should be the carefully
restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast
becoming the people's masters."
And we were warned by Franklin Roosevelt
in the aftermath of the Great Depression, when in 1936 he called out
"Economic Royalists" who today would be billionaires, saying:
"A
small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control
over other people's property, other people's money, other people's labor, other
people's lives.
For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no
longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness ... These
economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of
America.
What they really complain of is that we seek to take away
their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of
this kind of power."
We as a nation listened to
Roosevelt's warning and got behind him when he put in place a 94% top income
tax rate on the billionaires.
Republican President Dwight
Eisenhower kept that tax rate at 91% during his administration. And even
Richard Nixon embraced a 70% tax rate on the billionaires.
Today it's 35%, and we know where
that's gotten us.
Our nation does not thrive on the
goodwill of billionaires. We thrive on the hard work of average Americans who
wake up every day, go to work, care for their families, and raise children to
believe that America is a "WE" society -- a place where we all work
together.
Not a place where we wait for scraps
to fall off the billionaires' dining table.
Billionaires are not job creators,
they are not smarter than us, they are not harder workers. They are hoarders --
plain and simple.
If they had to convert their wealth
into actual things, they wouldn't be able to even move around in their lavish
mansions.
We need to bring back common sense
taxes on wealth, including an absolute tax above one billion dollars that once
and for all prevents the ascendancy of predatory billionaires in America.
Time to join the "No
Billionaires" campaign!
No comments:
Post a Comment